lab08: init
This commit is contained in:
80
lab08/monadLab.lhs
Normal file
80
lab08/monadLab.lhs
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
||||
Below we have some mathematical binary arguments that you may recognize from homework 2.
|
||||
|
||||
> data Binop =
|
||||
> Plus -- + :: Int -> Int -> Int
|
||||
> | Minus -- - :: Int -> Int -> Int
|
||||
> | Times -- * :: Int -> Int -> Int
|
||||
> | Divide -- / :: Int -> Int -> Int
|
||||
> deriving (Show)
|
||||
|
||||
applyOp performs these operations, but unlike in the homework,
|
||||
you now must consider errors (represented by 'Nothing').
|
||||
|
||||
> applyOp :: Binop -> Maybe Int -> Maybe Int -> Maybe Int
|
||||
|
||||
Plus is done for you. Notice how code must check for 'Nothing'
|
||||
for each operand.
|
||||
|
||||
> applyOp Plus mi mj =
|
||||
> case mi of
|
||||
> Nothing -> Nothing
|
||||
> Just i ->
|
||||
> case mj of
|
||||
> Nothing -> Nothing
|
||||
> Just j -> Just $ i + j
|
||||
|
||||
Minus is also done for you. This case **does** use monads,
|
||||
but without the do syntax.
|
||||
|
||||
> applyOp Minus mi mj =
|
||||
> mi >>= (\i -> mj >>= (\j -> Just $ i - j))
|
||||
|
||||
Implement Times and Divide. Try the Times case without monads (as we did with
|
||||
the Plus case).
|
||||
|
||||
> applyOp Times mi mj = error "TBD"
|
||||
|
||||
For the Divide case, use bind (>>=) as we did for Minus.
|
||||
On an attempt to divide by 0, return Nothing as the answer.
|
||||
|
||||
> applyOp Divide mi mj = error "TBD"
|
||||
|
||||
The following test cases will help you verify your changes.
|
||||
|
||||
> testapp1 = applyOp Minus (applyOp Times (Just 3) (Just 4)) $ applyOp Divide (Just 8) (Just 2)
|
||||
> testapp2 = applyOp Minus (applyOp Times (Just 3) (Just 4)) $ applyOp Divide (Just 8) (applyOp Plus (Just 3) (Just (-3)))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Now implement applyOp', which implements all methods using the do syntax.
|
||||
The Plus case is done for you once again. Be sure to check for zero with Divide.
|
||||
|
||||
> applyOp' :: Binop -> Maybe Int -> Maybe Int -> Maybe Int
|
||||
> applyOp' Plus mi mj = do
|
||||
> i <- mi
|
||||
> j <- mj
|
||||
> return $ i + j
|
||||
> applyOp' Minus mi mj = error "TBD"
|
||||
> applyOp' Times mi mj = error "TBD"
|
||||
> applyOp' Divide mi mj = error "TBD"
|
||||
|
||||
More test cases:
|
||||
|
||||
> testapp1' = applyOp' Minus (applyOp' Times (Just 3) (Just 4)) $ applyOp' Divide (Just 8) (Just 2)
|
||||
> testapp2' = applyOp' Minus (applyOp' Times (Just 3) (Just 4)) $ applyOp' Divide (Just 8) (applyOp' Plus (Just 3) (Just (-3)))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, note the following function for incrementing and decrementing ints.
|
||||
|
||||
> mincr :: Int -> Maybe Int
|
||||
> mincr i = Just $ i + 1
|
||||
|
||||
> mdecr :: Int -> Maybe Int
|
||||
> mdecr i = Just $ i - 1
|
||||
|
||||
Experiment with these functions and the >>= syntax.
|
||||
Here is one example:
|
||||
|
||||
> testIncDec = Just 7 >>= mincr >>= mincr >>= mincr >>= mdecr
|
||||
|
||||
Does bind seem more natural in this case than using do? Why or why not?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user