lab08: impl
This commit is contained in:
@@ -32,12 +32,19 @@ but without the do syntax.
|
|||||||
Implement Times and Divide. Try the Times case without monads (as we did with
|
Implement Times and Divide. Try the Times case without monads (as we did with
|
||||||
the Plus case).
|
the Plus case).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> applyOp Times mi mj = error "TBD"
|
> applyOp Times mi mj =
|
||||||
|
> case mi of
|
||||||
|
> Nothing -> Nothing
|
||||||
|
> Just i ->
|
||||||
|
> case mj of
|
||||||
|
> Nothing -> Nothing
|
||||||
|
> Just j -> Just $ i * j
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For the Divide case, use bind (>>=) as we did for Minus.
|
For the Divide case, use bind (>>=) as we did for Minus.
|
||||||
On an attempt to divide by 0, return Nothing as the answer.
|
On an attempt to divide by 0, return Nothing as the answer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> applyOp Divide mi mj = error "TBD"
|
> applyOp Divide mi mj =
|
||||||
|
> mi >>= (\i -> mj >>= (\j -> if j == 0 then Nothing else Just $ i `div` j))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The following test cases will help you verify your changes.
|
The following test cases will help you verify your changes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -53,9 +60,20 @@ The Plus case is done for you once again. Be sure to check for zero with Divide
|
|||||||
> i <- mi
|
> i <- mi
|
||||||
> j <- mj
|
> j <- mj
|
||||||
> return $ i + j
|
> return $ i + j
|
||||||
> applyOp' Minus mi mj = error "TBD"
|
> applyOp' Minus mi mj = do
|
||||||
> applyOp' Times mi mj = error "TBD"
|
> i <- mi
|
||||||
> applyOp' Divide mi mj = error "TBD"
|
> j <- mj
|
||||||
|
> return $ i - j
|
||||||
|
> applyOp' Times mi mj = do
|
||||||
|
> i <- mi
|
||||||
|
> j <- mj
|
||||||
|
> return $ i * j
|
||||||
|
> applyOp' Divide mi mj = do
|
||||||
|
> i <- mi
|
||||||
|
> j <- mj
|
||||||
|
> if j == 0
|
||||||
|
> then Nothing
|
||||||
|
> else return $ i `div` j
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
More test cases:
|
More test cases:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -75,6 +93,28 @@ Experiment with these functions and the >>= syntax.
|
|||||||
Here is one example:
|
Here is one example:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> testIncDec = Just 7 >>= mincr >>= mincr >>= mincr >>= mdecr
|
> testIncDec = Just 7 >>= mincr >>= mincr >>= mincr >>= mdecr
|
||||||
|
> testIncDec' = do
|
||||||
|
> i <- Just 7
|
||||||
|
> i <- mincr i
|
||||||
|
> i <- mincr i
|
||||||
|
> i <- mincr i
|
||||||
|
> i <- mdecr i
|
||||||
|
> return i
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Does bind seem more natural in this case than using do? Why or why not?
|
Does bind seem more natural in this case than using do? Why or why not?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The bind behaves sort of like an upgraded pipe `|` from shell,
|
||||||
|
where the output of one function is piped into the next function,
|
||||||
|
but with the added benefit of error handling
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The do syntax is a bit more explicit in this case, as it requires unwrapping the value,
|
||||||
|
performing the operation, and then wrapping the value back up
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> main :: IO ()
|
||||||
|
> main = do
|
||||||
|
> print testapp1
|
||||||
|
> print testapp2
|
||||||
|
> print testapp1'
|
||||||
|
> print testapp2'
|
||||||
|
> print testIncDec
|
||||||
|
> print testIncDec'
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user